クオリアの初出は？

クオリア（qualia）はギリシャ語？ラテン語？起源なので、コリャ昔からあるわいと高をくくっていたが……
スタンフォードの哲学事典にはこう書いてある。
======
"Feelings and experiences vary widely. For example, I run my fingers over sandpaper, smell a skunk, feel a sharp pain in my finger, seem to see bright purple, become extremely angry. In each of these cases, I am the subject of a mental state with a very distinctive subjective character. There is something it is like for me to undergo each state, some phenomenology that it has. Philosophers often use the term ‘qualia’ (singular ‘quale’) to refer to the introspectively accessible, phenomenal aspects of our mental lives. In this standard, broad sense of the term, it is difficult to deny that there are qualia. Disagreement typically centers on which mental states have qualia, whether qualia are intrinsic qualities of their bearers, and how qualia relate to the physical world both inside and outside the head. The status of qualia is hotly debated in philosophy largely because it is central to a proper understanding of the nature of consciousness. Qualia are at the very heart of the mind-body problem"(source: Qualia).
======
ところが、アイザイア・バーリンがオースティンと初期オックスフォード哲学について書いているエッセーには、C.I.ルイス『精神と世界秩序』(1929)のなかにクオリアについて言及している。また先のエンサイクロペディアの文献リストには Moore, G. E. 1922 "The Refutation of Idealism," in his Philosophical Studies, London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.の文献がみられる。
ウィキにはやはりルイスのこの著作を引いて次のように記載してある。
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
「C. I. Lewis, in his book Mind and the World Order (1929), was the first to use the term "qualia" in its generally agreed modern sense.
There are recognizable qualitative characters of the given, which may be repeated in different experiences, and are thus a sort of universals; I call these "qualia." But although such qualia are universals, in the sense of being recognized from one to another experience, they must be distinguished from the properties of objects. Confusion of these two is characteristic of many historical conceptions, as well as of current essence-theories. The quale is directly intuited, given, and is not the subject of any possible error because it is purely subjective（source:qualia by Wiki）.
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
ちなみに、バーリンの話だと、オースティンはクオリアについての説明を「完全なナンセンス」と一蹴したようだ。わからない話ではない。